Zekeriya at 23:30, 11 February 2026

2026-02-11T23:30:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 11 February 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Though a relatively quiet minority, some commentators since the eighth-century Bede have suggested that the notorious “666” of Revelation 13:18 alludes to the measurement of King Solomon’s excessive gold accumulation which immediately precedes his idolatrous downfall in the Biblical narrative. We now bolster that hypothesis with the observation that the letters of Solomon’s (New Testament Greek) name add up to 1,260, thereby linking this passage with the repeated references to “1,260 days” and related time durations in the preceding sections of the Apocalypse. We go on to adduce a diverse array of reasons to confirm Solomon as the intended solution over against competing candidates such as Nero Caesar and against other types of interpretations such as the purely symbolic. This approach to John’s “calculate the number” riddle – ''[[intertextuality]]'' feeding into ''forward [[gematria]]'' feeding into further intertextuality – has hermeneutical, exegetical, spiritual, canonical, geometrical, logical, and aesthetic advantages over popular ''reverse [[gematria]]'' attempts to search for a (generally extra-Biblical) name producing the value 666.		Though a relatively quiet minority, some commentators since the eighth-century Bede have suggested that the notorious “666” of Revelation 13:18 alludes to the measurement of King Solomon’s excessive gold accumulation which immediately precedes his idolatrous downfall in the Biblical narrative. We now bolster that hypothesis with the observation that the letters of Solomon’s (New Testament Greek) name add up to 1,260, thereby linking this passage with the repeated references to “1,260 days” and related time durations in the preceding sections of the Apocalypse. We go on to adduce a diverse array of reasons to confirm Solomon as the intended solution over against competing candidates such as Nero Caesar and against other types of interpretations such as the purely symbolic. This approach to John’s “calculate the number” riddle – ''[[intertextuality]]'' feeding into ''forward [[gematria]]'' feeding into further intertextuality – has hermeneutical, exegetical, spiritual, canonical, geometrical, logical, and aesthetic advantages over popular ''reverse [[gematria]]'' attempts to search for a (generally extra-Biblical) name producing the value 666.

	[[Category:~~Particular~~ numbers]]		[[Category:Symbolism of particular numbers]]

Zekeriya: Created page with "Abstract of "[https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2022-0245 Forward and Reverse Gematria are Very Different Beasts]," Open Theology 10.1 (2024): Though a relatively quiet minority, some commentators since the eighth-century Bede have suggested that the notorious “666” of Revelation 13:18 alludes to the measurement of King Solomon’s excessive gold accumulation which immediately precedes his idolatrous downfall in the Biblical narrative. We now bol..."

2026-02-11T23:29:38Z

Created page with "Abstract of "[https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2022-0245 Forward and Reverse Gematria are Very Different Beasts]," Open Theology 10.1 (2024): Though a relatively quiet minority, some commentators since the eighth-century Bede have suggested that the notorious “666” of Revelation 13:18 alludes to the measurement of King Solomon’s excessive gold accumulation which immediately precedes his idolatrous downfall in the Biblical narrative. We now bol..."

New page

Abstract of "[https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2022-0245 Forward and Reverse Gematria are Very Different Beasts]," Open Theology 10.1 (2024):

Though a relatively quiet minority, some commentators since the eighth-century Bede have suggested that the notorious “666” of Revelation 13:18 alludes to the measurement of King Solomon’s excessive gold accumulation which immediately precedes his idolatrous downfall in the Biblical narrative. We now bolster that hypothesis with the observation that the letters of Solomon’s (New Testament Greek) name add up to 1,260, thereby linking this passage with the repeated references to “1,260 days” and related time durations in the preceding sections of the Apocalypse. We go on to adduce a diverse array of reasons to confirm Solomon as the intended solution over against competing candidates such as Nero Caesar and against other types of interpretations such as the purely symbolic. This approach to John’s “calculate the number” riddle – ''[[intertextuality]]'' feeding into ''forward [[gematria]]'' feeding into further intertextuality – has hermeneutical, exegetical, spiritual, canonical, geometrical, logical, and aesthetic advantages over popular ''reverse [[gematria]]'' attempts to search for a (generally extra-Biblical) name producing the value 666.

[[Category:Particular numbers]]

666 - Revision history

Zekeriya at 23:30, 11 February 2026